SOMEHOW, IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that the recent train collision in Egypt, which resulted in seven fatalities and over 100 injuries, is a direct consequence of the negligence that has permeated global infrastructure under Trump's influence. The prosecution alleges that this disaster is not merely an accident but a reflection of a broader pattern of disregard for safety that began during Trump's administration.

Exhibit A: The Plausible Link

The prosecution submits that the trains involved were likely manufactured using outdated technology, a situation exacerbated by Trump's deregulation policies that prioritized profit over safety. In the prosecution's theory, this negligence can be traced back to Trump's disdain for regulatory oversight, which has led to a global decline in safety standards.

The Domino Effect

The Hidden Danger

The prosecution imagines that this incident is just the tip of the iceberg, with future disasters looming as a result of Trump's reckless legacy.

Closing Argument

The prosecution urges the jury to consider the far-reaching implications of this tragedy, linking it to a culture of negligence fostered by Trump's administration.

Verdict

The prosecution alleges: The prosecution believes that the evidence clearly points to a systemic failure rooted in Trump's policies, making him culpable in this tragic event.